Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
9d87c129ad fix: make check-then-hold atomic against concurrent bookings (#4)
Two simultaneous requests for the same nights could both pass is_available()
before either wrote its held row, double-booking the dates. Wrap the
is_available -> create_booking pair in a per-room asyncio.Lock
(_room_locks[room_id]) in services.request_booking, which both the HTTP and
RPC doors funnel through. FX + invoice creation stay outside the lock, so it
covers only the DB critical section.

Single-loop scope (LNbits runs one worker); documented the multi-worker
caveat (needs a DB-level guard) in event-flow.md and the crud.is_available
note.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019VUQCfdqiLSsFS2jcGnaFD
2026-07-19 17:08:43 +02:00
5cfc9b893d refactor: extract booking flow into services.py
Move availability quoting + the check-then-hold + invoice orchestration out
of views_api.py into a transport-agnostic services.py, with typed errors
(NotFound/Unavailable/ValueError/BookingError). views_api becomes a thin
HTTP door that maps those to status codes. No behavior change — this is so
the incoming nostr-transport door can share one booking flow instead of
duplicating it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019VUQCfdqiLSsFS2jcGnaFD
2026-07-19 01:30:13 +02:00