Auth + input-validation cluster (CODE-REVIEW-2026-06 #5, #6, #16, #17 + libra-#36, libra-#51, libra-#52): - can_access_user_data compares full user ids only. The 8-char prefix comparison was a 32-bit space: any prefix collision (or a crafted short target id) let one user read another's data. - can_access_account matches the User-{short} SEGMENT exactly; the substring test also matched accounts merely containing it (Expenses:Misc-User-deadbeef). - Manual-payment approve/reject are status-guarded (UPDATE ... WHERE status='pending' + rowcount): concurrent admins can't double-book. The approve endpoint claims the request BEFORE writing the ledger entry and reverts the claim if the write fails, so at most one journal entry can exist per request. - Account-name validation centralized into account_utils.validate_account_name (libra-#51) — called from crud.create_account (the choke point for every creation path, virtual parents allowed a bare root), the admin add-account endpoint, and fava_client.add_account at the writer boundary (libra-#52). - crud.create_account translates backend unique-violations into AccountExistsError instead of leaking sqlalchemy internals (libra-#36); POST /accounts returns 409 on duplicates and 400 on malformed names. get_or_create_user_account catches the domain error instead of string-matching the SQLite message (which never matched on Postgres). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
207 lines
6.7 KiB
Python
207 lines
6.7 KiB
Python
"""Auth narrowing + input validation.
|
|
|
|
Covers the PR-5 fixes:
|
|
- `can_access_user_data`: full-ID equality only (an 8-char prefix
|
|
comparison let prefix-colliding users read each other's data).
|
|
- `can_access_account`: exact User-{short} SEGMENT match (a substring
|
|
test also matched accounts merely containing it).
|
|
- Manual-payment approve/reject: status-guarded claim — concurrent
|
|
admins can't double-book (CODE-REVIEW-2026-06 #16).
|
|
- POST /accounts: duplicate → 409 instead of a leaked
|
|
IntegrityError 500 (libra-#36); malformed name → 400 (libra-#51).
|
|
"""
|
|
import asyncio
|
|
import importlib
|
|
from uuid import uuid4
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from .helpers import submit_manual_payment_request
|
|
|
|
pytestmark = pytest.mark.anyio
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _module(name: str):
|
|
for prefix in ("lnbits.extensions.libra", "libra"):
|
|
try:
|
|
return importlib.import_module(f"{prefix}.{name}")
|
|
except ModuleNotFoundError:
|
|
continue
|
|
raise ModuleNotFoundError(f"libra.{name}: tried both import paths")
|
|
|
|
|
|
auth = _module("auth")
|
|
libra_crud = _module("crud")
|
|
mdl = _module("models")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _ctx(user_id: str) -> "auth.AuthContext":
|
|
return auth.AuthContext(
|
|
user_id=user_id, wallet_id="w", is_super_user=False, wallet=None,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# can_access_user_data — full-ID equality
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def test_prefix_colliding_user_cannot_access_other_users_data(client):
|
|
caller = "deadbeef" + uuid4().hex[8:]
|
|
victim = "deadbeef" + uuid4().hex[8:] # same 8-char prefix, different id
|
|
assert victim != caller
|
|
|
|
assert await auth.can_access_user_data(_ctx(caller), caller) is True
|
|
assert await auth.can_access_user_data(_ctx(caller), victim) is False
|
|
# A crafted short target id must not match either.
|
|
assert await auth.can_access_user_data(_ctx(caller), caller[:8]) is False
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# can_access_account — exact segment match
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def test_account_access_requires_exact_user_segment(client):
|
|
user_id = "deadbeef" + uuid4().hex[8:]
|
|
suffix = uuid4().hex[:6]
|
|
|
|
# An account whose LAST SEGMENT merely contains "User-deadbeef".
|
|
lookalike = await libra_crud.create_account(
|
|
mdl.CreateAccount(
|
|
name=f"Expenses:Misc-User-deadbeef-{suffix}",
|
|
account_type=mdl.AccountType.EXPENSE,
|
|
description="substring-match bait",
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
owned = await libra_crud.create_account(
|
|
mdl.CreateAccount(
|
|
name=f"Assets:Receivable-{suffix}:User-deadbeef",
|
|
account_type=mdl.AccountType.ASSET,
|
|
description="genuinely owned",
|
|
user_id=user_id,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
ctx = _ctx(user_id)
|
|
assert await auth.can_access_account(
|
|
ctx, lookalike.id, mdl.PermissionType.READ
|
|
) is False, "substring-only match must not grant access"
|
|
assert await auth.can_access_account(
|
|
ctx, owned.id, mdl.PermissionType.READ
|
|
) is True
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Manual payment approve/reject — status-guarded claim
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def test_concurrent_approvals_create_exactly_one_entry(
|
|
client, super_user_headers, configured_user,
|
|
):
|
|
_, wallet = configured_user
|
|
submitted = await submit_manual_payment_request(
|
|
client,
|
|
wallet_inkey=wallet.inkey,
|
|
amount_sats=10_000,
|
|
description=f"race {uuid4().hex[:6]}",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
r1, r2 = await asyncio.gather(
|
|
client.post(
|
|
f"/libra/api/v1/manual-payment-requests/{submitted['id']}/approve",
|
|
headers=super_user_headers,
|
|
),
|
|
client.post(
|
|
f"/libra/api/v1/manual-payment-requests/{submitted['id']}/approve",
|
|
headers=super_user_headers,
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
statuses = sorted([r1.status_code, r2.status_code])
|
|
assert statuses[0] == 200, f"one approval must win: {statuses} {r1.text} {r2.text}"
|
|
assert statuses[1] in (400, 409), (
|
|
f"the losing approval must fail cleanly, got {statuses}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Exactly one ledger entry references this request.
|
|
listing = await client.get(
|
|
"/libra/api/v1/entries/user",
|
|
headers={"X-Api-Key": wallet.inkey},
|
|
)
|
|
assert listing.status_code == 200
|
|
link = f"MPR-{submitted['id']}"
|
|
matching = [
|
|
e for e in listing.json()["entries"] if link in (e.get("links") or [])
|
|
]
|
|
assert len(matching) == 1, (
|
|
f"expected exactly one journal entry for {link}, got {len(matching)}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def test_reject_after_approve_conflicts(
|
|
client, super_user_headers, configured_user,
|
|
):
|
|
_, wallet = configured_user
|
|
submitted = await submit_manual_payment_request(
|
|
client,
|
|
wallet_inkey=wallet.inkey,
|
|
amount_sats=5_000,
|
|
description=f"approve-then-reject {uuid4().hex[:6]}",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
r = await client.post(
|
|
f"/libra/api/v1/manual-payment-requests/{submitted['id']}/approve",
|
|
headers=super_user_headers,
|
|
)
|
|
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
|
|
|
|
r = await client.post(
|
|
f"/libra/api/v1/manual-payment-requests/{submitted['id']}/reject",
|
|
headers=super_user_headers,
|
|
)
|
|
assert r.status_code in (400, 409), (
|
|
f"rejecting an approved request must fail, got {r.status_code}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# POST /accounts — duplicate and malformed names
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def test_create_duplicate_account_returns_409(
|
|
client, super_user_headers,
|
|
):
|
|
name = f"Expenses:DupTest-{uuid4().hex[:6]}"
|
|
body = {"name": name, "account_type": "expense", "description": "dup test"}
|
|
|
|
r = await client.post(
|
|
"/libra/api/v1/accounts", headers=super_user_headers, json=body,
|
|
)
|
|
assert r.status_code == 201, r.text
|
|
|
|
r = await client.post(
|
|
"/libra/api/v1/accounts", headers=super_user_headers, json=body,
|
|
)
|
|
assert r.status_code == 409, (
|
|
f"duplicate create must 409, not leak an IntegrityError: "
|
|
f"{r.status_code} {r.text}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def test_create_account_with_invalid_name_returns_400(
|
|
client, super_user_headers,
|
|
):
|
|
r = await client.post(
|
|
"/libra/api/v1/accounts",
|
|
headers=super_user_headers,
|
|
json={
|
|
"name": 'Expenses:bad"name\nfoo',
|
|
"account_type": "expense",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
assert r.status_code == 400, (
|
|
f"malformed account name must 400 before reaching the ledger: "
|
|
f"{r.status_code} {r.text}"
|
|
)
|