libra/tests/test_auth_validation.py
Padreug c0d371036b fix(auth): exact-match authorization; guard reviews; centralize name validation
Auth + input-validation cluster (CODE-REVIEW-2026-06 #5, #6, #16, #17
+ libra-#36, libra-#51, libra-#52):

- can_access_user_data compares full user ids only. The 8-char prefix
  comparison was a 32-bit space: any prefix collision (or a crafted
  short target id) let one user read another's data.
- can_access_account matches the User-{short} SEGMENT exactly; the
  substring test also matched accounts merely containing it
  (Expenses:Misc-User-deadbeef).
- Manual-payment approve/reject are status-guarded
  (UPDATE ... WHERE status='pending' + rowcount): concurrent admins
  can't double-book. The approve endpoint claims the request BEFORE
  writing the ledger entry and reverts the claim if the write fails,
  so at most one journal entry can exist per request.
- Account-name validation centralized into
  account_utils.validate_account_name (libra-#51) — called from
  crud.create_account (the choke point for every creation path,
  virtual parents allowed a bare root), the admin add-account
  endpoint, and fava_client.add_account at the writer boundary
  (libra-#52).
- crud.create_account translates backend unique-violations into
  AccountExistsError instead of leaking sqlalchemy internals
  (libra-#36); POST /accounts returns 409 on duplicates and 400 on
  malformed names. get_or_create_user_account catches the domain
  error instead of string-matching the SQLite message (which never
  matched on Postgres).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 15:52:29 +02:00

207 lines
6.7 KiB
Python

"""Auth narrowing + input validation.
Covers the PR-5 fixes:
- `can_access_user_data`: full-ID equality only (an 8-char prefix
comparison let prefix-colliding users read each other's data).
- `can_access_account`: exact User-{short} SEGMENT match (a substring
test also matched accounts merely containing it).
- Manual-payment approve/reject: status-guarded claim — concurrent
admins can't double-book (CODE-REVIEW-2026-06 #16).
- POST /accounts: duplicate → 409 instead of a leaked
IntegrityError 500 (libra-#36); malformed name → 400 (libra-#51).
"""
import asyncio
import importlib
from uuid import uuid4
import pytest
from .helpers import submit_manual_payment_request
pytestmark = pytest.mark.anyio
def _module(name: str):
for prefix in ("lnbits.extensions.libra", "libra"):
try:
return importlib.import_module(f"{prefix}.{name}")
except ModuleNotFoundError:
continue
raise ModuleNotFoundError(f"libra.{name}: tried both import paths")
auth = _module("auth")
libra_crud = _module("crud")
mdl = _module("models")
def _ctx(user_id: str) -> "auth.AuthContext":
return auth.AuthContext(
user_id=user_id, wallet_id="w", is_super_user=False, wallet=None,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# can_access_user_data — full-ID equality
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
async def test_prefix_colliding_user_cannot_access_other_users_data(client):
caller = "deadbeef" + uuid4().hex[8:]
victim = "deadbeef" + uuid4().hex[8:] # same 8-char prefix, different id
assert victim != caller
assert await auth.can_access_user_data(_ctx(caller), caller) is True
assert await auth.can_access_user_data(_ctx(caller), victim) is False
# A crafted short target id must not match either.
assert await auth.can_access_user_data(_ctx(caller), caller[:8]) is False
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# can_access_account — exact segment match
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
async def test_account_access_requires_exact_user_segment(client):
user_id = "deadbeef" + uuid4().hex[8:]
suffix = uuid4().hex[:6]
# An account whose LAST SEGMENT merely contains "User-deadbeef".
lookalike = await libra_crud.create_account(
mdl.CreateAccount(
name=f"Expenses:Misc-User-deadbeef-{suffix}",
account_type=mdl.AccountType.EXPENSE,
description="substring-match bait",
)
)
owned = await libra_crud.create_account(
mdl.CreateAccount(
name=f"Assets:Receivable-{suffix}:User-deadbeef",
account_type=mdl.AccountType.ASSET,
description="genuinely owned",
user_id=user_id,
)
)
ctx = _ctx(user_id)
assert await auth.can_access_account(
ctx, lookalike.id, mdl.PermissionType.READ
) is False, "substring-only match must not grant access"
assert await auth.can_access_account(
ctx, owned.id, mdl.PermissionType.READ
) is True
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Manual payment approve/reject — status-guarded claim
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
async def test_concurrent_approvals_create_exactly_one_entry(
client, super_user_headers, configured_user,
):
_, wallet = configured_user
submitted = await submit_manual_payment_request(
client,
wallet_inkey=wallet.inkey,
amount_sats=10_000,
description=f"race {uuid4().hex[:6]}",
)
r1, r2 = await asyncio.gather(
client.post(
f"/libra/api/v1/manual-payment-requests/{submitted['id']}/approve",
headers=super_user_headers,
),
client.post(
f"/libra/api/v1/manual-payment-requests/{submitted['id']}/approve",
headers=super_user_headers,
),
)
statuses = sorted([r1.status_code, r2.status_code])
assert statuses[0] == 200, f"one approval must win: {statuses} {r1.text} {r2.text}"
assert statuses[1] in (400, 409), (
f"the losing approval must fail cleanly, got {statuses}"
)
# Exactly one ledger entry references this request.
listing = await client.get(
"/libra/api/v1/entries/user",
headers={"X-Api-Key": wallet.inkey},
)
assert listing.status_code == 200
link = f"MPR-{submitted['id']}"
matching = [
e for e in listing.json()["entries"] if link in (e.get("links") or [])
]
assert len(matching) == 1, (
f"expected exactly one journal entry for {link}, got {len(matching)}"
)
async def test_reject_after_approve_conflicts(
client, super_user_headers, configured_user,
):
_, wallet = configured_user
submitted = await submit_manual_payment_request(
client,
wallet_inkey=wallet.inkey,
amount_sats=5_000,
description=f"approve-then-reject {uuid4().hex[:6]}",
)
r = await client.post(
f"/libra/api/v1/manual-payment-requests/{submitted['id']}/approve",
headers=super_user_headers,
)
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
r = await client.post(
f"/libra/api/v1/manual-payment-requests/{submitted['id']}/reject",
headers=super_user_headers,
)
assert r.status_code in (400, 409), (
f"rejecting an approved request must fail, got {r.status_code}"
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# POST /accounts — duplicate and malformed names
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
async def test_create_duplicate_account_returns_409(
client, super_user_headers,
):
name = f"Expenses:DupTest-{uuid4().hex[:6]}"
body = {"name": name, "account_type": "expense", "description": "dup test"}
r = await client.post(
"/libra/api/v1/accounts", headers=super_user_headers, json=body,
)
assert r.status_code == 201, r.text
r = await client.post(
"/libra/api/v1/accounts", headers=super_user_headers, json=body,
)
assert r.status_code == 409, (
f"duplicate create must 409, not leak an IntegrityError: "
f"{r.status_code} {r.text}"
)
async def test_create_account_with_invalid_name_returns_400(
client, super_user_headers,
):
r = await client.post(
"/libra/api/v1/accounts",
headers=super_user_headers,
json={
"name": 'Expenses:bad"name\nfoo',
"account_type": "expense",
},
)
assert r.status_code == 400, (
f"malformed account name must 400 before reaching the ledger: "
f"{r.status_code} {r.text}"
)