fix: resuming an auto-paused contract no longer discards the backlog
Found by tracing what happens when a back-dated backfill contract cannot fetch a historical rate. The failure handling itself was fine — period 0 fails, the backlog halts so nothing settles out of order, five ledger rows record the reason, no money moves, and the contract auto-pauses once the retry budget is spent. The recovery was not. The operator fixes the cause (switches to a stated rate, or to current), clicks Resume, and periods_done jumps 0 -> 6: every unpaid payday silently written off, contract back to looking healthy, employee never paid. The confirm dialog even asserted the missed paydays "are written off" — true of one kind of pause and a lie about the other. Two features colliding. "Do not backfill a deliberate pause" is right when the operator paused: the pause *was* the decision not to pay. It is wrong when payroll paused, because nobody decided anything — the money is still owed and the operator has just removed whatever blocked it. Contracts now carry `paused_reason`, set only when payroll pauses them and cleared by a deliberate pause. Resume infers from it, and an explicit `catch_up` still overrides either way. The console asks a different question for each, quoting the reason, and flags a payroll-paused contract in the table so the distinction is visible before anyone clicks. Verified end to end: five failing ticks leave periods_done at 0 and pause with "period 0 (2026-08-01) failed 5 times: no historical EUR rate available for 2026-08-01"; resuming after switching to a manual rate keeps the position at 0, and the next tick settles all seven owed periods. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018jy52j9GRZ6XKa1Zt21LLj
This commit is contained in:
parent
1584eb337f
commit
e77f431d47
8 changed files with 168 additions and 22 deletions
16
views_api.py
16
views_api.py
|
|
@ -214,14 +214,18 @@ async def api_pause_contract(contract_id: str) -> Contract:
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
@payroll_api_router.post("/api/v1/contracts/{contract_id}/resume")
|
||||
async def api_resume_contract(contract_id: str, catch_up: bool = False) -> Contract:
|
||||
async def api_resume_contract(
|
||||
contract_id: str, catch_up: bool | None = None
|
||||
) -> Contract:
|
||||
"""Put a paused contract back to work.
|
||||
|
||||
Paydays missed during the pause are skipped by default — a pause is a
|
||||
decision not to pay them, and resuming into an unannounced multi-period
|
||||
transfer is the opposite of what "resume" implies. `catch_up=true` pays
|
||||
them, for a pause that was an operational hold rather than a decision
|
||||
about the money.
|
||||
What happens to the paydays missed during the pause depends on who
|
||||
paused it. An operator pause *was* the decision not to pay them, so they
|
||||
are written off. A pause payroll applied itself — a period that
|
||||
exhausted its retries — means the money is still owed and the operator
|
||||
has just fixed whatever blocked it, so the backlog is kept.
|
||||
|
||||
Pass `catch_up` explicitly to override that inference.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return await _transition(
|
||||
contract_id, lambda c: services.resume(c, catch_up=catch_up)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue