feat(cash-in): super_config.max_cash_in_sats per-tx cap + UI (#31)
Some checks failed
ci.yml / feat(cash-in): super_config.max_cash_in_sats per-tx cap + UI (#31) (pull_request) Failing after 0s

Wires the server-side per-transaction cash-in ceiling the `create_withdraw`
handler already enforces (it read the value defensively via getattr; this
makes it a first-class config field).

- migrations.py m012: ADD COLUMN super_config.max_cash_in_sats INTEGER (NULL
  = no cap).
- models.py: SuperConfig.max_cash_in_sats + UpdateSuperConfigData field with a
  >= 0 validator.
- super-fee dialog: a "Max cash-in per transaction (sats)" input; blank sends
  null (the PUT skips null, preserving the current value — set 0 to reject
  every cash-in). crud `update_super_config` and the PUT endpoint flow the
  field through automatically (dynamic dict update; check_super_user gated).

Why a sats cap and not the bunker ACL: the ACL / usage caps (#28) gate call
*rate*, not *sats*, and `principal_sats` is necessarily ATM-attested — so a
single in-rate call could request an arbitrarily large payout. This bounds a
compromised/buggy machine to one capped transaction.

Verified on the dev stack: m012 runs, the model round-trips the column
(GET returns the set value), and a negative value is rejected.
This commit is contained in:
Padreug 2026-06-22 12:51:59 +02:00
commit 9abf695fd5
4 changed files with 54 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -1381,6 +1381,11 @@
label="Super fee destination wallet_id"
hint="LNbits wallet that collects the platform fee"
class="q-mb-md" dense outlined></q-input>
<q-input v-model.number="superFeeDialog.data.max_cash_in_sats"
label="Max cash-in per transaction (sats — blank = no cap)"
hint="Server-side ceiling on a single cash-in's principal. The ATM attests the amount; this bounds a compromised/buggy machine to one capped tx."
type="number" step="1" min="0"
class="q-mb-md" dense outlined></q-input>
</q-card-section>
<q-card-actions align="right">
<q-btn flat label="Cancel" v-close-popup></q-btn>